Whichever agent names the biggest number is obviously the one who has done the most homework.
That is what most sellers believe when three appraisals come back forty to sixty thousand dollars apart. It feels like common sense. More market knowledge should mean a more accurate number, and the agent who arrives at the biggest figure must simply be the one who has done their homework properly.
The Gap Between Appraisals That Nobody Questions
When a seller gathers three appraisals for the same property, the results are rarely a tight cluster around one figure. The spread is frequently wide enough that at least one number cannot be close to right. Sellers seldom stop to consider which. Trust tends to default to the biggest figure offered, largely because it lines up with what the seller wanted to hear in the first place.
Beyond being a valuation, an appraisal always carries a second function: it is a pitch for the mandate, whether or not the agent frames it that way. Two agents can walk through an identical property, review identical comparable sales data, and still arrive at wildly different figures, because one is genuinely pricing the house while the other is pricing their own chance of winning the listing. It is a distinction worth keeping in mind before the first appraisal appointment For anyone comparing agents before committing to one view this page is a reasonable place to start. Whichever agent walks through the door first, this dynamic is usually already in play.
Why a High Appraisal Is not the Same as an Accurate One
A high quoted figure is not automatically a sign of stronger market knowledge. Just as often it signals a willingness to tell the seller what they want to hear, purely to win the listing. That is not always conscious dishonesty either. Plenty of agents believe their own optimistic number right up until the campaign runs and the market disagrees with them. Either way, the outcome is the same: an agent chosen on a figure that was never really about the genuine value of the property.
What makes this uncomfortable is that sellers rarely find out until the campaign is well underway, once the property has sat on the market for weeks without the level of interest the original appraisal implied it should get. A closer look at how this plays out shows the pattern clearly Sellers wanting to understand this dynamic in more depth click here is worth a look before appointing anyone. It rarely changes the fundamentals, but it can save a seller from finding out the hard way.
What a Genuinely Defensible Appraisal Looks Like
The appraisals actually worth listening to are rarely the most confidently delivered ones. They are the ones backed by real comparable sales, recent settlement figures, and a straightforward account of what nearby buyers have genuinely paid in recent months. An agent who can walk a seller through that evidence is doing something entirely different from one who just states a number with certainty. Confidence and accuracy are not the same thing, and sellers who conflate them tend to pick the wrong agent for the wrong reason.
There is an easy way to test this. An agent whose number genuinely holds up can usually name the specific sales it is based on, within a sensible timeframe and a genuinely comparable location. An agent leaning mostly on optimism tends to talk in vague terms about a strong market, without ever pointing to anything concrete behind the figure just quoted.
The property is not the problem here. The appraisal process is.
What Actually Deserves Attention From a Seller Instead
The right question is rarely which agent believes the property is worth the most. It is closer to which agent has a genuine strategy for reaching real market value, and which one is willing to have an honest conversation if the campaign does not move at the quoted figure straight away. How an agent has previously handled a mid-campaign price adjustment tends to say far more than any number offered at a first meeting ever could.
This is also where a seller can learn the most simply by asking directly. An agent willing to discuss what happens if the first few weeks do not go to plan is behaving very differently to one who has only ever talked about the upside.
What Sellers Usually Want to Know
Why does the same property get such different appraisal figures from different agents?
Appraisals combine genuine market judgement with an incentive to win the listing, and different agents weigh those two things differently. The spread between quotes often reflects that incentive as much as it reflects the property itself. An agent under pressure to secure new business has a reason to lean optimistic that has nothing to do with the comparable sales in the area.
Is it ever safe to just go with the highest number quoted?
On occasion, yes, but only when the evidence behind it earns that trust, not because it happens to be the biggest figure quoted. A high number backed by real comparable sales bears little resemblance to one offered purely to secure the business, and asking what it is actually based on is the only way to separate the two.
What is a better question to ask an agent than simply the appraisal figure?
Asking what evidence supports the number, and what the plan of the agent is if the property does not attract offers at that figure early on, tends to reveal far more than the number itself. It also tends to separate agents comfortable defending their figure from agents who were hoping the question would not come up.
Is a lower appraisal figure a sign of a weaker agent?
Not necessarily. A lower, well-supported figure from an agent who can walk through the comparable sales behind it is often a stronger signal than a higher figure with no evidence attached. Sellers who filter agents purely on the size of the number they quote are optimising for the wrong variable entirely.
Rather than a true measurement of the house, an appraisal is really an opening bid for the listing itself, and sellers who recognise this early tend to choose very differently to those chasing the highest figure. Across the Gawler District and the northern Adelaide corridor, where the spread between agent appraisals can be just as wide as elsewhere in Adelaide, this distinction matters more rather than less, given how fast a mispriced campaign can lose momentum where comparable listings surface close together.